Oregon's Ban on Gay Marriage Struck Down by Federal Judge

On Monday, May 19, 2014, U.S. District Judge Michael McShane struck down Oregon's ban on gay marriage. The ban, which was passed by Oregon voters in 2004, was deemed unconstitutional.

For the many same-sex couples and gay rights advocates living in Oregon, the ruling was a significant victory. After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) last year, Oregon now becomes one of seven other states to have a Federal Judge strike down a gay marriage ban. These other states include Arkansas, Utah, Texas, Virginia, Michigan, Oklahoma, and Idaho. A total of seventeen states and Washington, D.C. allow same-sex marriage.

In his ruling, McShane stated that Oregon's ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional, as it discriminates against same-sex couples without "a rational relationship to any legitimate government interest." He also added that the ban violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution's 14 th Amendment. His decision included a powerful message in support of marriages in which couples are committed to love, devotion, and the family unit – regardless of their gender and sexuality.

Although it may not have been an easy battle, the new ruling is warmly welcomed by many throughout the state. State officials have reported that they are prepared to immediately carry out same-sex marriages, and lines were already formed outside of the county clerk's office in Portland in anticipation of the ruling.

At McKinley Irvin, our legal team has long supported same-sex couples in their fight for the right to be married. Our family law attorneys have also worked with many LGBT families throughout the years. If you have questions about your rights or a family law matter, contact us to discuss your needs.

Comments

No Comments Posted

Contact Us

Important Notice: Your privacy is important to us. Information sent via this form is not protected by attorney/client privilege. Please view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Hire. Please note, we do not accept service of legal process or correspondence from opposing parties or their counsel through our website.